A. B, the defendant and the defendant Gap's attorney-at-law, 200,000 won and the defendant Gap's attorney-at-law, 200,000 won on December 17, 2014

A. The facts of recognition 1) Defendant Network A, F, G, and H agree to establish a joint venture on July 14, 2008 to manufacture and sell technologies owned by Defendant Network A and products related to patent rights acquired by Defendant Network A (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

(B) The Plaintiff was established as a joint venture company under this Agreement, and the content of this Agreement relating to this case is as follows: F, B, G, H, and C: Defendant Net A (hereinafter the same shall apply in this Schedule)

Article 3 (Investment and Equity Shares in Joint Venture Enterprises) A and B, respectively, shall contribute 50 million won in cash to joint venture enterprises until July 25, 2008.

2) Byung agrees to transfer all patents acquired or to be acquired by Byung and all rights related thereto at the same time as this Agreement is signed by the Joint Ventures. Byung will also provide all know-how, technical information and technology owned by Byung in connection with the Joint Ventures Joint Ventures Joint Ventures Joint Ventures Joint Ventures Joint Ventures Joint Ventures. Byung must fulfill in good faith and without delay the obligations under the patent transfer agreement entered into separately with respect to the assignment of a patent. 3) Byung must ensure that the Joint Ventures Joint Ventures are supplied to I and J’s existing suppliers.

Article 6 (Repayment of Obligations and Support Plans for Diseases) Joint Venture Enterprises and Gap and Eul shall cooperate to lend KRW 200,000 to the extent that it does not bear any burden on the operating funds of Joint Venture Enterprises for the following one year.

2) On July 14, 2008, pursuant to Article 6 of the instant arrangement, Plaintiff, F, and G agreed to lend KRW 200 million to Defendant Net A for a fixed period of two years, and paid KRW 200 million on July 23, 2008 (hereinafter “instant lending”).

(2) Defendant B and Defendant A’s attorney-at-law (hereinafter “Defendant B”)

The defendant Gap guaranteed the debt of this case by the defendant Gap.

In addition, this case.