However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From around May 2013, the Defendant continued to live separately with the victim D (the age of 57) who was her wife from around May 2016, and was paid back to the “F Inn's house” located in Pyeongtaek-si E operated by the victim from around May 2016. On August 27, 2016, the Defendant asserted that the victim continued contact with another male on the ground that the victim had been given continuous contact with the other male and received documents, and then, on August 29, 2016, the Defendant received documents by agreement with the Lanwon District Court Lanwon Branch around 14:00 on August 29, 2016, the Defendant saw the rest of the Fn's house, which was flicked with the body, was fleeped and fl

On August 29, 2016, the Defendant phoneed the victim on August 20, 2016, and purchased one stopner (2 liter size) from a paint store located in Pyeongtaek-si G on the same day at around 20:04, the Defendant purchased one stopner (2 liter size). On the same day at around 20:08, the Defendant used one stopner purchased as above and carried one stopter with the victim and his/her his/her his/her his/her his/her wife, H and two customers, with his/her head, laid the 1st floor of the above Fer, the Defendant’s head, thereby spreading his/her width into the Defendant’s body.

Accordingly, the defendant prepared a fire prevention with a view to preventing a fire in the Furgical accommodation, which is a structure in which the victims and many customers live.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 60 (3) of the Juvenile Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Code does not set the sentencing guidelines, and thus, the defendant's mistake is recognized, the defendant has no criminal record other than the fine prior to around 1999, the victim D does not want the punishment of the defendant, the risk of the crime of this case is very large, but the actual damage does not occur, and the defendant's peculiar nature is the incurable disease.