When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

On November 18, 2012, 04:40 on November 18, 2012, the Defendant driven Cradon car, and proceeded at approximately 50 kilometers in speed from the south bank of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government along the three-lane road in front of the road along the road of the road. In such cases, the Defendant was in front of the Defendant’s vehicle, by negligence in violation of the signal while driving the driver’s duty to reduce the speed and to pay attention to safely drive under the new subparagraph, despite the fact that there was a duty to pay attention to safely drive under the new subparagraph.

In this way, the Defendant suffered from injury to the victim D and the victim F, who is the passenger of the si in the above-mentioned occupational negligence, for approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on black boxes and video CDs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;