마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (a punishment of imprisonment of two years, confiscation, confiscation, 3,403,250) is too unreasonable.
2. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the Defendant’s acknowledgement of the instant crime and the reflection of the instant crime.
However, even though the defendant had been already punished several times for the same crime of narcotics, each of the crimes of this case was committed again during the period of repeated crime of narcotics, and the number of times the defendant handled phiphones and marijuana has frequently been transferred, and the sales and distribution of phiphones has been made. However, considering the fact that the defendant's driving has been done even under the administration of phiphones, and other various sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive for the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be said that the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.