However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the above sentence shall be executed.

"2015 Highest 661 (Defendant A)"

1. On October 25, 2014, at around 11:00 on October 25, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement with the victim E, “The victim E, located in Gangwon-do, will work as the main employee,” and “The victim would work as the main employee.”

However, there was no intention to work as the main employee.

The defendant and the above B received 3.5 million won from the victim to the Busan Bank account in the name of H on the same day, and 5 million won from the Agricultural Bank account in the name of B.

Accordingly, the defendant was delivered property by deceiving the victim in collusion with the above B.

2. On May 13, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement with the Victim I to the Victim I at the law firm reputation office located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Nam-si, 368, stating that “The Victim I would work as an employee from the J entertainment tavern located in the Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, the President of the Republic of Korea would work as an employee.”

The written indictment states that “in a place where it is impossible to know the place of non-fashion on May 13, 2015, the victim I called “J” operated by the victim I in Chungcheongnam-nam, to make a pre-paid payment to the main employee.” However, in a case where there is no risk of substantial disadvantages to the defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense, it does not violate the principle of non-fashion, even if the court acknowledged facts different from those of the facts charged without going through the amendment of indictment within the same scope, and thus, it does not violate the principle of non-fa

However, there was no intention to work as the main employee.

On the same day, the Defendant and the Defendant received 4.67 million won from the Busan Bank Account in the name of the Defendant, and 5.122 million won from the Agricultural Bank Account in the name of B.

Accordingly, the defendant was delivered property by deceiving the victim in collusion with the above B.

"2015 Highest 731 (Defendant B)"

1. The victim E;