The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the records, the court below was just in holding that there was no proof of a crime of occupational breach of trust due to the issuance of bills Nos. 4 and 5 of the crime list among the facts charged in this case as stated in the judgment of the court below among the facts charged in this case, and there was no error of law by misapprehending the legal principles as to "risk of occupational breach of trust" in the crime

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.