업무상과실치상
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.
The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. In fact, the Defendant merely provided the victim with his her sensium, and there was no fact about her mathnity, and the victim's pel density is lower than the pelle density of the general public, and thus the victim's result of injury cannot be ruled out to be caused by other causes, not the Defendant's act. Thus, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in
B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (2 million won) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s judgment as to the assertion of mistake of fact and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the trial court, i.e., whether the victim requested his/her husband and wife to leave her husband and wife after the completion of his/her life.
The defendant did not file an application, and the defendant shall file a written decision to grant ex officio.
A statement was made to the effect that his or her father and wife paid the expenses for his or her old age, including that his or her father and wife, and that his or her mother’s son G also paid the expenses for his or her old age.
whether or not the request was made to Mazin
“......”
The term "the third person's body will meet this kind of body even if requested."
“ ......”
Defendant is deemed to have only the mother and have given the right to report.
Meanwhile, the statement to the effect that the statement “the statement statement” was made by the victim to the effect that the Defendant was a marina, and corresponds to the victim’s statement as to whether the Defendant was a marina. ② The victim pressured the Defendant on the part of the Defendant’s hand by using a pipe of the store. The victim thought that the Defendant was able to say that the Defendant was fright and was fright, even though the body was fright during the mash, and the body was frighted during the mash, and confirmed that the Defendant was frightd in the mash (the page of the evidence record) and confirmed that the Defendant was frighted at the mash or the mash room, etc., and that the Defendant was frightd (the page of the evidence record).
e.m.