A. At around 16:00 on May 16, 2014, the Defendant entered the pet dog of the name of “F” (hereinafter “the instant pet dog”) into the pet dog, not the pet dog, but the general hand room of the name of “F” in the Goyang-gu, Yongsan-gu, Busan (hereinafter “cosmetic room”).

At that time, at the entrance of the above department store and each entrance of the cosmetic of this case, the notice board, “Isle to take access to pet animals,” was attached.

B. The Defendant left the pet dog on the table located in the center of the beauty room of the instant case and got beauty art service at a seat far away from that metres. At that time, the body body of the pet dog of this case inside the hand room, and the head and the front of the pet were protruding out from the hand room.

(see subparagraph 4-1, 2, e.g., video).

The Plaintiff, an employee of the beauty art room of this case, arranged the instant World Cup on the table of the above table, discovered the instant dog, as close as the face towards the dog, and led to the name of the dog.

Therefore, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the skin loss, the scarcity scarcity, the scarcity scarcity of the skin, and the brusium, etc. of the Plaintiff.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1 through 3, 5 through 7, Eul's 1 through 15 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant should not enter a pet dog in a place where pet dog access is not allowed, and even if pet dog enters a place, he should keep pet dog in an exclusive bags, etc. and pay attention to the management of pet dog by placing pet dog in a place where pet dog does not harm others, etc.