1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal, including the costs of supplementary participation, are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. The plaintiffs added or added part of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case, and the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding new or new arguments to the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following Paragraph 2. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, and the main text of
The 3rd page "Plaintiffs" shall be deemed to read "Plaintiffs".
Article 18-20 of the first 4th 18-20 portion of the “existing Consent Holders” is to read “eight owners of land, etc. omitted from 203 members list (Evidence A 23) and three owners of State and public land are added, the Consent Authorities shall be 214 persons (=8 persons, 203 persons).”
The 7th page "two persons" shall be raised to "three persons".
The 10th page 5 to 17 shall be as follows.
The former Urban Improvement Act (amended by Act No. 13508, Sept. 1, 2015; hereinafter referred to as the “former Urban Improvement Act”).
The proviso to Article 24(5) provides that, where a resolution is made at a general meeting, at least 10/100 of the members of the association shall be present at the general meeting, and in the case of a general meeting that resolves to formulate or amend a project implementation plan, a project implementation plan, and a management and disposal plan, at least 20/100 of the members of the association shall be present at the general meeting. Comprehensively considering the overall purport of the arguments in each of the written evidence Nos. 21 and 22, the instant promotion committee held on August 20, 2015 (hereinafter “instant inaugural general meeting”).
) A person who has signed the meeting for the attending nature register (person in question or his/her representative) is a total of 56 persons (i.e., 20 persons who have attended the meeting without submitting a written resolution of 36 persons who have attended the meeting); and the minutes of the inaugural general meeting of the association are recognized as having been stated that 56 persons have attended the meeting as above at the time of 15:20.
However, there is a problem.