On November 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny for six months from the prison prison labor in prison and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 25, 2016.

1. On August 7, 2016, at around 01:55, the Defendant discovered that the victim D was locked in the fore and in the fore and in the fore and in the fore part of Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-si, the Defendant: (a) opened the fore and on the part of the victim, who was under the influence of alcohol; (b) opened the fore and took a door of the above fore and on the part of the victim; and (c) stolen it with a cell phone of the amount of KRW 90,000,00,000, KRW 10

2. On August 12, 2016, the Defendant discovered that the victim F was under influence of alcohol in the subway station located in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, 1147, and stolen it with one cellular phone equivalent to KRW 1.50,00,00 in the market price, which is the victim’s possession lower than the above victim, in the subway station located in 1147.

3. On January 20, 2017, at around 23:21, the Defendant discovered that the victim I was under influence of alcohol in front of the H restaurant located in Sungnam-gu G, Sungnam-si, and then stolen the victim’s 1,500 won in cash, which is the victim’s possession of the victim’s 1,500 won in cash, following the victim’s clothes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or I;

1. A written statement;

1. Each report on occurrence;

1. Photographss of each crime, CCTV screen pictures, and CCTV images;

1. Reports on internal investigation (ctv investigation);

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry of criminal history, reporting of investigation (verification of criminal history), and application of the text of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Act to treat concurrent crimes: Provided, That Article 39(1) (the crime 1, 2, and 39(1) of the same Act to be committed, and the crime of larceny to be committed in the judgment of November 25, 2016);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 (Crimes of 1, 2, and 50 in the judgment) of the Criminal Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes, is well-grounded.