2. Even when considering the fact that the defendant led to confession and reflect on each of the crimes of this case, and that economic situation is difficult, each of the crimes of this case is committed by the defendant while driving a vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance, thereby causing two injury to the victim by negligence, and destroying the above vehicle with the repair cost, etc. so that it would be equivalent to 2.4 million won, etc., and the case is not easy in light of the contents of the crime and the degree of damage, etc., although the last period has passed after the crime of this case, it does not reach an agreement with the victim until the trial, but does not recover actual damage, and there was a history of having been punished for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the past, and in particular, each of the crimes of this case was committed during the period during which the crime of this case was suspended due to fraud, and in full view of all the circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the court below is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.