When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around September 19, 2014, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the case of revocation of disposition imposing global income tax, etc. between the Plaintiff B and the head of Sungnam District Tax Office on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant, with the consent of 9 co-owners, sold the following facts: (b) around February 17, 2006, after receiving 1.5 billion won (1.5 billion won upon deduction of transfer income tax) from Gwangju City, under the consent of 1.5 billion won; (c) the Plaintiff’s agent, without having sold the above real estate to a third party with the real estate consulting; (d) the Plaintiff’s agent’s testimony that “the Plaintiff’s agent did not have received the purchase price pursuant to the sales contract,” and “the Plaintiff’s agent’s testimony” was written as “the purchase price of the pertinent land, including the purchase price of the instant land,” and “the Plaintiff’s agent’s testimony was written as “the purchase price of the instant land,” and the Plaintiff’s agent’s testimony was written as “the purchase price of the instant land.”