A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
Co-defendant C was urged from D to dispose of the said BMW car in the name of women-friendly district D, while entering and operating the EMW car in the name of women-friendly district, and around April 21, 2013, the Defendant was only required to dispose of the BMW car, or “BM passenger car” at the G soup in the front city F at the front city of the front city on April 21, 2013. This is not because the installment is not the case. In order to pay the insurance money by intentionally causing an accident, a son has to assist him to pay the other installment. He was driving and returned to the front house and returned to a proper place, and if a traffic accident occurs, the remaining day will be dealt with, and the Defendant approved this.
On April 22, 2013, at around 00:46, the Defendant and Co-Defendant C: (a) driven EMW on the roads near the long-distance in the Sonjin-gu, Jinjin-gu, Soon-dong, Soon, the Defendant and Co-Defendant C: (b) discovered the delivery protection screen on the right side of the road while Co-Defendant C was making a right-hand in the following direction: (c) caused an accident by some of them; and (d) reported that Co-Defendant C was “the driver’s driver’s driver’s driver’s driver’s driver’s driver’s driver’s accident” to the victim LIG damage insurance company.
As above, the Defendant and Co-Defendant C had the victim LIG damage insurance company pay KRW 16,79,000 from the victim LIG damage insurance company to Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd., who is the mortgagee of the vehicle mortgage, and paid KRW 1,070,000 as the repair cost for the India Protection Daehan Co., Ltd.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with Co-Defendant C, by deceiving the victim LIG damage insurance company as above, acquired 17,869,000 won in total as the repair cost of the vehicle and the repair cost for the delivery of the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Co-defendant C each.