All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because each sentence (one year of imprisonment with prison labor, two years of suspended sentence in August, and six months of imprisonment with prison labor in case of Defendant C) declared by the lower court to the Defendants is excessively unreasonable.
2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the confession and rebuttal of the Defendants, Defendant B and C committed the instant crime, Defendant A committed each of the instant crimes even during the repeated crime period due to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.). In particular, the crime of the K Gameland-related to the crime of the crime of the crime of paragraph (2) of this Article was re-exploited during the investigation into the crime of paragraph (1) F Game Games-related crimes, and Defendant B borrowed the name of Defendant A and played the so-called so-called head of the branch office. Defendant C committed the instant crime again even during the period of repeated crime. Defendant C had the record of punishment several times due to the same similar crimes, and again committed the instant crime even during the repeated crime. Defendant C was punished for committing the similar crime at the same place in the past; Defendant A committed the instant period of punishment; Defendant C had no extenuating circumstances after the sentence of the lower judgment was sentenced; Defendant C’s imprisonment with prison labor for an excessive period of imprisonment and punishment based on the sentencing guidelines set forth by the Criminal Procedure Commission (a.
Therefore, each of the defendants' arguments on unfair sentencing are without merit.
3. In conclusion, since all appeals by the Defendants are without merit, they are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.