On June 9, 2017, at around 00:10, the Defendant assaulted the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties on the handling of 112 reports on the following grounds: (a) on the E convenience stores located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, the Defendant “a fluence to the reporter while making a statement on the street urology” in front of the E convenience stores; and (b) upon receipt of 112 reports, G police officers belonging to the F District of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Dongjak Police Station called out to explain the report and require identification; and (c) upon demand for presentation of identification, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s left eye once

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act is a fluent university student who has no criminal history despite the Defendant’

It is difficult to see, and considering the fact that the victim has not been punished for the defendant)