A. misunderstanding of facts (i.e., a mistake of facts) as stated in Article 1-A(1) of the judgment of the court below was prepared with prior consent from C, so the defendant's defense counsel without any intention under the foregoing Article did not have any intention. Although it was true that the defendant supplementeds his signature as to this part of the facts charged with C's permission, the defendant submitted a summary of pleadings that recognizes this part of the facts charged. Then, the defendant was guilty of the crime (i.e., a charge of payment of KRW 35 million on Feb. 24, 2010) as stated in Article 1-A(ii) of the judgment of the court below (i.e., a charge of forgery and use of KRW 35 million on Nov. 5, 2009 through Dec. 29, 2000, C lent KRW 35 million to C, prepared by C, and according to the testimony of AH such as payment, there was no forgery of the above payment.

Article 1-B of the judgment of the court below (U.S.C. 35 million won on May 24, 2010, forged a payment note of KRW 39 million on May 2, 2008, forged a cash receipt of KRW 39 million on July 31, 2008, forged a bill of KRW 42 million on forgery, forged a bill of KRW 9 million on November 28, 201, forged a bill of KRW 9 million on a bill of KRW 200,000,000,000 on April 10, 201, and KRW 201.3 million on a one-time loan of KRW 35 million on a one-time loan of KRW 30,000 on a one-time loan of KRW 30,000 on a one-time loan of KRW 201 on a one-time loan of KRW 300,000 on a one-time loan of KRW 301,205.3