When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 5, 2018, at the court of Jeonju District Court No. 2, 2018, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of Jeonju District Court No. 2018Kadan585 case (hereinafter “E”), Jeonju District Court No. 2018 (hereinafter “C”) (hereinafter “E”) and the prosecutor’s “E” to start the same type of business, and then asked the witness of “E, assault, threat, etc. occurred in the course of protesting against D”, and then, the C Women’s president continued to take juice within C and took an oath.”

However, in fact, B, the president of “C” women’s president, at the time, did not fall within “C” because it was disputed with “E” as well as F and G.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Copies of each protocol of examination of the witness by Defendant, D, and H;

1. Copy of the judgment;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a copy of the transcript of examination of witness in the D appellate court);

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;