except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. When the funds are insufficient, the Defendant had his intent to forge a promissory note in the name of a good credit and to lend funds.

On March 2013, the Defendant, at the office of the Defendant located in the Junggu-gu, Daegu-gu, a police officer, made a total of eight promissory notes from the above date to April 2013, including: “40,000” in the face value column, “D”, “E68” in the place of payment column, “B”, and “B” in the issuer column; and written eight promissory notes from the above date to the above date to the police officer from April 2013, as shown in the Schedule of Crimes.

In this respect, the Defendant forged eight promissory notes in the name of securities B for the purpose of exercising the rights.

2. On March 2013, the Defendant exercised a promissory note in the form of cash discount as stated in the attached list of crimes, i.e., a total of eight promissory notes from the above date to the police officer around April 2013, as stated in the attached list of crimes, from G located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu to H, who knew of such forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of one copy of a written request for personal bills and eight copies of promissory notes;

1. Article 214 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime (the title of securities) and Articles 217 and 214 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;