A. From July 2, 2015 to December 1, 2015, the Plaintiff operating a construction machinery leasing business at the construction site of the Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) from July 2, 2015 to December 1, 2015, the Plaintiff incurred rent of KRW 94,700,00,000, at the Defendant’s request; (b) upon partial reduction at the Defendant’s request, the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 87,60,000 to the Plaintiff; (c) on June 18, 2016, the Defendant leased ckes to the Defendant and the rent of KRW 11,40,00 was incurred; and (d) the Plaintiff deducted KRW 4,710,00,00 (a agreed amount of KRW 87,60,000,000 from the agreed amount of KRW 11,40,000,000 from the agreed amount of KRW 11,710,00).

B. The defendant's assertion asserts that the defendant himself has the responsibility to pay the Crerererecing fee to the Korean Precinc inc inc inc inc inc inc inc inc inc in

2. Determination

A. According to the claims of KRW 87,600,000, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3 (including paper numbers), and Gap evidence 5, it is recognized that the transaction name statement prepared by the plaintiff was written as "(State) return to Korea," and that the plaintiff was written as "(State) return to Korea," but according to Gap evidence 6, the defendant is obligated to pay KRW 87,60,000 to the plaintiff on June 7, 2016, because it can be recognized that the plaintiff prepared and issued a written confirmation that "the plaintiff must complete the payment of KRW 87,60,000 from the plaintiff to the plaintiff from July 2, 2015 to January 2, 2016." Thus, even if the lessee of the plaintiff agreed to pay the plaintiff KRW 87,60,00,000 to the plaintiff, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff KRW 860,00,00,00,00.

B. According to each description of the part concerning the claim for the use fee of the Crest on June 2016 and the Gap evidence No. 7 (including the provisional number), the "Certificate of Use of Construction Machinery, done around June 2016 between the plaintiff and the defendant."