beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.12.10 2015나18536

약정금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows: "The result of the party's personal examination of the defendant C alone" in the 3th 9th eth 9th eth eth eth 1st eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e

The summary of the plaintiff's argument for additional determination did not have the authority to act on behalf of the defendants for the preparation of payment certificates.

However, I is the trade employee of the defendant company, who was granted a partial comprehensive power of attorney on the management and disposition plan of the defendant company as the chief of the defendant company, and was closely consulted on the agreement with the defendant C, the representative director of the defendant company, and therefore, I believed that I has the authority to act on behalf of the defendants in relation to the preparation of the payment certificate of this case, and there is a justifiable reason to believe that I has the authority to act on behalf of

As such, the defendants bear the responsibility of expression manager under Article 14 of the Commercial Act or the liability of expression agent under the Civil Act.

The plaintiff asserts in the trial that I is a commercial employee who has been granted a partial comprehensive power of representation from the defendant company, and thus, the defendants are responsible for the expressive agent. The plaintiff is decided by the argument that I bears the responsibility for the expressive agent under the Commercial Act or the liability for the expressive agent under the Civil Act. Family I's drafting of the payment certificate of this case constitutes an unauthorized representation.