사문서위조등
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.
However, as to the Defendants for three years from the date of the final judgment of this case, the Defendants are above.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B is a person who conducts bond business, and the defendant A is a building business and has lent money from the defendant B since 2000.
1. Violation of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Name A by Defendant A;
A. On September 7, 2011, the Defendant proposed that D shall register the ownership transfer of land D in the name of Jeonnam-gun E and F purchased by the Defendant, and completed the registration of ownership transfer of the said land in the name of D prior to the same day in the name of D, Gwangju District Court’s support registration and registration of ownership transfer of the said land in the name of D.
Accordingly, the Defendant registered the real right under the name of the title trustee according to the title trust agreement.
B. On September 7, 2011, the Defendant proposed that G shall register the ownership transfer of the said land in the name of G with respect to the Ha (H, I), J, and K in the name of Nam-Namnam-gun, which the Defendant purchased, and completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the said land in the name of G on the same day in the name of G. On the same day in the name of G.
Accordingly, the Defendant registered the real right under the name of the title trustee according to the title trust agreement.
2. On September 16, 2011, the Defendants forged private document, with the consent of G/D, set up a right to collateral security against Defendant B’s A, with the consent of G/D, for the security of the claim for loans worth KRW 800 million against Defendant A. In order to secure the right to collateral security against Defendant B, the Defendants set up a right to collateral security against Defendant B’s A’s son as a mortgagee, a debtor, and a debtor.
In addition, the Defendants conspired to forge the letter of delegation of notarial deed with respect to the Defendant’s above loan obligation as joint and several sureties, on the following grounds: (a) the ownership transfer registration has been made in the name of G in accordance with the title trust agreement; (b) the Defendants conspired to forge the letter of delegation
around October 18, 2011, Defendants (Defendant B) in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, 19 Dong 232 had corporate bonds business.