When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around 04:45 on June 13, 2015, the Defendant did not pay a taxi fee from 227 occa, Mapo-gu, Seoul, and was urged to pay a taxi fee and return home from the victim D, who is a police officer, who was dispatched upon receipt of a report. However, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “I am close to this madro, Madas, Madas, Madas, Madas, Madas, Madas, I am.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Witness D and C each testimony;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a taxi charge receipt;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;