However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a space between the victim B (n, 13 years of age) and the so-called “original cooperation.”

1. On June 8, 2018, the Defendant, from around 23:00 on June 8, 2018 to around 04:00 of the following day, assaulted the victim’s left side son by having known that the victim would exchange contact with E, the vessel of the victim following his death, from around 04:00 on June 8, 2018.

2. On June 10, 2018, the Defendant, from around 01:00 to around 05:00 on June 10, 2018, sent the victim’s head 20 times in the front of the F convenience store in Osan-si, on the ground that the victim, E, the victim’s former male-child offered G, and the victim’s friendship H was born to the Defendant’s vehicle, and the victim was faced with the Defendant’s head her seat and drinking at around 20 times in the front of the foregoing vehicle, on the ground that the victim was living together, and the victim was her head her head her hand and drinking at around 10 times in the front of the said vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of recommendations based on sentencing guidelines for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is two to ten months. The background leading up to assault, the relationship between the defendant and the victim, the degree of assault, the criminal records of the defendant, etc. shall be taken into account in sentencing.