When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 22:40 on October 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports that the proprietor was used on the street before the port-to-port ‘D’ restaurant located in the Northern-si C; and (b) obstructed a police officer’s legitimate execution of duties by putting in the ground floor and obstructing a police officer’s legitimate execution of duties by asking her slope F’s place of residence and contact number to have her home home home home home home, and doing so to the her assistant F in order to have her home home home abroad; (c) driving her home at the front of the patrol vehicle called to the site; and (d) driving her hand to the lower end of the patrol vehicle called to the site on the ground that the slopeF would have come up by her hand in order to keep his hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;