However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 15:40 on July 6, 2013, under the influence of alcohol on 0.116%, the Defendant driven a Drocketing car as one of its duties, and led the Defendant to drive the two-lane front of the U.S. Hacheon-gun, Cheongcheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, in the direction of the entrance into the direction of the entrance into the entrance. In such a case, the road is opened on the right side of the road, and the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front direction of the running direction and to prevent accidents. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant was under the duty of care to prevent accidents, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant was under the influence of 0.16% of alcohol, and the Defendant was under the control of the Defendant with the right side part of the above 6 Garen-gun-gun's office without operating the steering gear rapidly to the left side part of the 6 Garen-gun's office, and the Defendant was under the direction of the victim's 1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to survey reports on actual condition, photographs, stops, reports on detection of drivers and circumstantial statements, diagnosis certificates, and written estimates;

1. The duties of Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act for criminal facts, Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act.