When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 00:30 on November 16, 2013, the Defendant reported that the Defendant D (the age of 58) was stuffed at the Defendant’s dwelling room located in the Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Incheon, and that the Defendant was able to stuff in the above dwelling area. However, the Defendant left the Defendant’s arms by using both hand and strings of the victim’s chests, and got off the victim’s chests in the above Do-gu, the Defendant was able to walk and walk the part of the victim’s legs and the Do-gu part, and met the victim’s face by hand.

In light of the above, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as the number of days of treatment in which the victim was treated, and the influence of the body of the arms and the side.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of witness E (excluding the part concerning the professional statement);

1. Statement made by witnesses D in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Statement made by a witness F in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Statement of the suspect examination protocol of the prosecution concerning D;

1. Partial statement of each police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant;

1. Entry of the police suspect interrogation protocol and statement of witness in D;

1. Statement made by the police officer in F and G;

1. Each description of a criminal investigation report (Attachment of D medical records) and a criminal investigation report;

1. Each description of a copy of medical examination and treatment records or a copy of an emergency department;

1. Images of images of damaged parts of the victimD;

1. The telephone call details (D mobile phone call) (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was assaulted by the victim and did not take place as the victim. However, the victim's statements concerning criminal facts are specifically, front and rear circumstances, and the contents of G's statements and telephone calls are given credibility to the victim's statements. The victim's statements are more likely to be true than that of the defendant's assertion that the statement made by F, a major witness, in investigative agency and court, is consistent with the victim's assertion that the crime is completely denied (F).