If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

피고인은 2013. 1. 6. 18:30경 서울시 관악구 C에 있는 D 지하상가 음식점에서 술을 마시고 있던 피해자 E(71세)에게 접근하여 이런저런 이야기를 하다가 피해자에게 “목걸이를 보세요, 땡겨 보세요”라고 말하였다.

In order to hear the end, the victim was released from his own galth, and the victim was her galth, and the victim galthed and galthed, and the victim again galthed to the victim, and the defendant stolen the victim's net gold (50,000,000 won) at the market price of the victim's galth, which was put in the victim's galth, by using the gap where the victim's attention was neglected.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to entries in seizure records;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence presented before the guilty ground of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, namely, the discovery of the victim’s counter-influence in the Defendant’s wall, it can be acknowledged that the Defendant stolen the victim’s counter-influence.