In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

1. On June 4, 2014, Defendant A was a volunteer who was working in the office of “H” in the election campaign office of G elected as a candidate for F Party in the election of the head of the office of the head of Busan Metropolitan City E-Gu, and Defendant B was a volunteer who was working in the office of “I” in the above election campaign office.

On the other hand, on February 11, 2014, G was accused of the charge of breach of trust and embezzlement with the purport that the administrative property was used free of charge at the time of the head of the office of the head of the office of Busan Metropolitan City, E-gu, and that the business promotion expenses were used unfairly.

2. No one shall publish or have anyone publish false facts about the place of birth, status, occupation, career, property, personality, conduct, organization to which he/she belongs, etc. of a preliminary candidate in favor of a preliminary candidate by means of a speech, broadcast, newspaper, communications, magazine, poster, propaganda document, or other means with the intention of getting him/her elected or to be elected in connection with the intraparty competition;

A. Under the circumstances where Defendant A, which was carried out from April 27, 2014 to April 28, 2014, had a primary election for the election of candidates for the head of the e-gu Busan Metropolitan City E-gu, Busan Metropolitan City E-gu Office of the F Party, which was carried out on April 28, 2014, G’s election campaign office volunteers at around 10:00 on the 25th of the same month, notified the Defendant of the phone call stating that “J requested personal information from the head of the Gu to the head of the Gu (G) at the above election campaign office located on the third floor of the Busan metropolitan E-Gu office, Busan, Busan, the head of the Gu, and the case of accusation against the head of the Gu (G shall be promptly terminated. The same shall apply to the case of accusation).” The Defendant, despite being aware of the fact that there was a social trend of J regarding the handling of the above accusation case, and the prosecution did not actually take any measures, the Defendant’s 15th of the above smart network service (G).