The plaintiff is a legal couple who has completed the marriage report with C on August 28, 1977.

B. In the dialogue with C, the Defendant sent back to the end of C, “I am locked and I am able to perform this bad operation”, “I am saw I am al, I am al, I am al, I am al, I am al, I am al, I am al, I am al, I am al, I am al, I am am al, I am al, I do not deny the fact of the appearance with the Defendant in the conversation that was divided into the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

2. Determination

(a) A third party who has a liability for damages shall not interfere with a married couple's communal life falling under the nature of marriage, such as interfering with a married couple's communal life by interfering with another person's communal life;

In principle, a third party's act of infringing on or interfering with a marital life falling under the essence of marriage by committing an unlawful act with either side of the married couple and causing mental pain to the spouse by infringing on the rights of the spouse as the spouse.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2013Meu2441 Decided May 29, 2015 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Meu2441). “Unlawful act committed by a spouse under Article 840 Subparag. 1 of the Civil Act” includes a wider concept including a adultery, and includes any unlawful act that does not reach the gap between husband and wife, but does not fulfill the duty of good faith (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 88Meu7, May 24, 198). According to the above recognized facts, the Defendant committed an unlawful act, such as an act, even though he/she is a spouse, having knowledge that he/she is a spouse, giving and taking contact for a considerable period and dividing conversations that suggest sexual intercourse, thereby infringing