beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.03.16 2016고단6500

전기통신사업법위반

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for two years, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Relation] Defendant A is a person who operates a mobile phone sales store under the trade name of F in Daegu Northern-gu E, and Defendant B and Defendant C are a person who solicits each pre-paid phone lending.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A

(a) No one shall solicit, mediate, mediate, or place an advertisement on a contract for the provision of telecommunications services necessary for the use of a mobile device on condition that funds are provided or lent, and no one shall solicit, arrange, or mediate a contract for the provision of telecommunications services necessary for the use of a mobile device on condition that funds are provided

The Defendant made an advertisement under the condition that B, C, andless noble persons, etc. pay or lend money to a lender in the name of a mobile phone, and solicits a borrower in the name of the mobile phone to enter into a mobile phone by soliciting the lender in the name of the user and paying money to the lender in the name of the user in the name of the user in the name of the user in the name of the user in the name of the user in the name of the user in the name of the user in the name of the user in question.

B, C, and nameless boxes, etc. were proposed to offer money from the phone distributors G (Ga name) to open the mobile phone. From April 2015 to May 2016, they solicited to enter into a contract for the provision of telecommunications services necessary for the use of mobile communications terminal devices on the condition that they offer the lending party and offer or lend funds by advertising with the contents of “cash payment in the opening of the mobile phone, etc.” between themselves, such as a living information route (road, etc.) and the Internet block, from April 2015 to May 2016. Dur the above period, the Defendant: (a) opened I mobile phone in the name of a lender recruited by the above method from F, a mobile phone sales store in the Defendant’s operation; and (b) opened I mobile phone over the total of 1,180 units as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (A).