When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who drives another car on a Saturday.

On December 15, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 20:15, and led to the passage of the rooftop intersection, which is located in the 62-ro of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, to the intersection of the missionary mission from the direction of the police box, which is a rooftop, to the north speed.

There are crosswalks where pedestrian signals are installed, so in such cases, the defendant who drives a vehicle had a duty of care to stop in front of the crosswalk when pedestrian signals are sent to the defendant.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim C (35) who was walking the above crosswalk due to the negligence of blocking the pedestrian signals of the above crosswalk, and did not get the victim to go beyond the crosswalk. The defendant got the victim to go beyond the right part of the above crosswalk.

Therefore, the Defendant suffered injury, such as “the catum catum cats and tensions,” which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. Scenese photographs of CCTVs 19 CCTVs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) and Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;