유치권 부존재 확인
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part pertaining to the five conclusion) and that of the part pertaining to the defendant, except to revise or add the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows (2) and to supplement or add the judgment as follows (3).
2. The modified portion of the 5th below is to modify “land and buildings” with “land” as “land.”
5 Under 5, the term “land and building” shall be modified to “land”.
6 The term "land and buildings" in the 6th place shall be modified to "land".
6 2 to 7 c.m. shall be deleted under the 6th page.
7 The "land and buildings" of six parallels shall be modified to "land".
7 The 7th parallels to 10 parallels shall be corrected to “the 7th parallels,” and “the 7th parallels.”
7 - 9 up to 10 deleted.
7 2 to 8 pages shall be deleted under the 7th page.
10. The term “or buildings” of 7 parallel pages shall be deleted.
10 10 pages "land and buildings" shall be modified into "land".
10 Under 10, the term "land and buildings" shall be modified into "land".
10 Under 10, the term "real estate" shall be modified to "land".
3. Supplement and addition of judgments;
A. Defendant’s assertion 1) The Defendant occupied the instant land as a lessee of the instant land, and disbursed the instant land as indicated below. Since it is beneficial costs increased the value of the instant land, the Defendant has the right to claim reimbursement of beneficial costs equivalent to KRW 712,638,00 with respect to the instant land as the secured claim. 【the ticket] Expenditure expenses (the value of the raw medicinal trees for growing KRW 385,000,000,000 for the 2nd order manufacturing expenses for the storage facilities of this case, and KRW 210,000,000 for the warehouse construction expenses of this case 36,000,000 for the storage facilities of this case. < Amended by Act No. 6360, Mar. 1, 1999; Act No. 6265, Oct. 36, 199; Act No. 6265, Oct. 1, 200>