However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 4, 2020, at around 00:33, the Defendant: (a) received a report of assault at the entrance of the 1st underground floor B located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and received a report of assault at the entrance of the C, and was asked to ask questions about the details of assault and personal information from the slope E belonging to the Daegu-gu Police Station D Zone D District, the Defendant used the said E at once.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police investigation of suspect with regard to F;

1. Each police statement made to E, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the report of internal death (number 12);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (see, e.g., Article 62(1) that the defendant recognized the crime of this case; Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do1448, Apr. 2

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;