From February 16, 2014 to January 31, 2019, the Defendant filed a complaint against the victim B by quasi-rape, etc. against the victim who was the victim B from around February 16, 2014, and the Defendant was prosecuted for quasi-rape on June 26, 2019, and is currently pending in the trial.

1. On June 13, 2019, at around 20:00, the Defendant entered the victim’s residence by using the toilets from the proprietor of the business in Daegu-gu C and the first floor, resulting in the Defendant’s intrusion upon the victim’s residence by using the password prior to entering the said building E, which was known to the victim’s residence, through the joint entrance, and then using the password prior to entering the victim’s residence, 30 minutes of disturbance.

2. On June 13, 2019, at around 20:25, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the fact that “Along with the hearing of two men on the proprietor of the pertinent D cafeteria and his name in the front door of the foregoing E E, the Defendant: (a) was able to have been able to engage in rape; (b) has been able to commit rape; (c) has been able to commit indecent act by force; and (d) has been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to engage in indecent act by force; and (d)

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Relevant Article 319 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 of the Criminal Act, Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. A fine of one million won to be suspended;

4. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (the daily calculation amount: 100,000 won) of the Criminal Act.

5. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., circumstances to be considered in light of circumstances, radius, and primary charge);