However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 8, 2011, the Defendant is a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act by receiving a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 from the Gwangju District Court to a fine of KRW 2,00,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act; on January 12, 2012, the summary order of KRW 3,00,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act; on August 22, 2012, the Gwangju District Court issued a summary order of KRW 5,00,00 for a fine of KRW 5,00,00 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court at least twice.

On August 22, 2018, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at 0.128% of alcohol level, driven a 3km string-ro from the alleyway in Gwangju Mine-gu to the shooting distance of the E Hospital located in Gwangju Mine-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reporting on detection;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Cracking photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: To refer to inquiries and to the application of each summary order statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. are as follows: The defendant's mistake is recognized; and the criminal records of the defendant, blood alcohol concentration level, driving distance, etc. are taken into account;