A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four years and by imprisonment for two years.

[Criminal Justice] On January 23, 2006, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at Suwon District Court on August 23, 2006; on August 12, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court on August 12, 201; Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of larceny at the Suwon District Court on November 25, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

"2014 Gohap186"

1. Defendant A

A. On December 2013, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) found the victim D who was locked in the vehicle by taking advantage of the street near the Sinnam-Eup at the time of the insular wave, and opened a locked entrance on the said vehicle, and opened one string off the Samsung Card owned by the victim, which was located in the container bed next to the driver’s seat, and included the above crime sight list.

1. From No. 1 to No. 14, 14 stolen another’s property worth KRW 8,100,000 in total by the same veterinary method over 14 times.

Defendant, in addition to this, a list of offenses in attached Form

1. Nos. 1 through 23: Provided, however, the victim’s “E” No. 22 of the Attached Table 1. E is deemed to be a clerical error in the H, as the victim’s “E” and “G” No. 23 of the Attached Table 1.

The phrase “10,800,000 won” written in the indictment of KRW 18,900,000 in total, independently or in combination with B, is deemed to be a clerical error. As such, the phrase “18,900,000 won” was corrected to be “18,90,000 won, which is the sum of the damages as stated in the Nos. 1 through 21 of the Criminal List.”

considerable amount of other's property was stolen.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen another's property.

B. The Defendant, in violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, is working at the JMaart located in O.O.K. on July 25, 2013, and even if the purchase of goods did not intend or have the ability to make a normal settlement of the price.