The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

1. From July 2012 to April 17, 2013, the Defendant changed the form and quality of forest C, 2,213 square meters, without obtaining permission to convert a mountainous district from the viewing of friendliness, which is the competent administrative agency, and failed to implement an order to divert the forest, despite the fact that he/she received an order to divert the forest from the viewing of friendliness, despite the fact that he/she received an order to divert the forest, on September 4, 2013; < Amended by Act No. 11904, May 7, 2014; Act No. 12844, Jun. 9, 2014; Act No. 12844, Aug. 4, 2014; Act No. 12847, Oct. 17, 2014; Act No. 13325, May 6, 2015; Act No. 13328, Jun. 9, 2015>

2. From July 2013 to August 2013, 2013, the Defendant changed the form and quality of chlorosung City D, C, E, forest land 2,254 square meters from the viewing of ignified, which is the competent administrative agency, and did not perform an order for restoration even though he/she received an order for restoration from the viewing of ignified, despite the fact that he/she received an order for restoration on the basis of its original status on November 5, 2015, respectively. < Amended by Act No. 11748, Dec. 2, 2013; Act No. 12844, Jun. 9, 2014; Act No. 12844, Aug. 4, 2014; Act No. 12837, Oct. 17, 2014; Act No. 13325, May 6, 2015; Act No. 13328, Jun. 9, 2015>

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. The Defendants: Articles 55 subparag. 10 and 44(1)2 of the Mountainous Districts Management Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act