beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.02.06 2013가단58164

건물명도

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A shall have the third floor of 85.90 square meters of a building listed in the attached list;

B. Defendant B shall enter in the separate sheet.

Reasons

1. According to the facts that there is no dispute over the cause of the claim and the overall purport of Gap evidence and arguments, as to the embezzlement of the plaintiff company's money, with respect to the buildings listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the multi-family house in this case"), which the defendant A owned in order to compensate for the embezzlement amount, the registration of the right to claim ownership was completed on July 4, 2013, and the principal registration of the right to claim ownership was completed on September 17, 2013, on which September 17, 2013, the principal registration of the right to claim ownership was completed in the name of the plaintiff. At present, the third floor in this case was 85.9 square meters of the multi-family house in this case, the third floor in this case was 85.90 square meters of the multi-family house in this case, and the owner of the multi-family house in this case was able to recognize the fact that the owner of the multi-family house in this case, who is the owner of each of the plaintiff.

2. Defendant A’s assertion is alleged to the effect that the Plaintiff may deliver the occupied part of the Plaintiff’s claim to be a condition that the Plaintiff bears the director’s expenses, etc., taking into account the circumstances in which the Defendant A’s family members have no other place. However, this cannot be a reason for refusing the Plaintiff’s request for extradition. Thus, Defendant A’s above assertion is without merit.

3. Determination as to Defendant B’s assertion

A. Defendant B’s assertion is Defendant A’s children, and Defendant B’s independent family by marriage, and on April 25, 2009, leased the instant subparagraph 201 from Defendant A to KRW 65 million, and completed the move-in report for resident registration and resided together with his family with his/her family with his/her family with the date having the fixed date. On January 26, 2013, when the deposit amount is increased by KRW 30 million, Defendant B and the lessee was leased from Defendant B’s wife as the wife of Defendant B, and entered into a lease agreement with Defendant A with the term of lease until January 25, 2015.