Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 50.

The Defendant is the representative director of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”).

1. On December 31, 2012, the Defendant received a false purchase tax invoice stating as if he was supplied with goods of KRW 901,80,000,00, in the office of Jungwon-dong 158-1 Housing Site Digital Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Ss branch digital”) in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “S branch digital”) and even if he was not supplied with goods or services from Es branch digital, a false purchase tax invoice was issued.

2. On December 29, 2012, the Defendant issued a false sales tax invoice stating that the Defendant supplied goods of KRW 794,000,000,000 in the office located in Ulsan-si G (hereinafter “B”), despite the fact that the Defendant did not supply goods or services to B, one copy of the false sales tax invoice stating that the Defendant supplied goods of KRW 794,00,000,000 in the same method at the same place on December 31, 2012, and issued one copy of the false sales tax invoice stating that the goods of KRW 100,000,000 were supplied to B.

Defendant A was a registration director and an actual operator of B from April 12, 2012 to January 15, 2014, and Defendant B was a corporation with the purpose of the Ethypt system business.

1. No defendant A shall be issued or issued a tax invoice under the Value-Added Tax Act without supplying or being supplied with goods or services;

On December 29, 2012, the Defendant received or issued three copies of false sales and purchase tax invoices in total amount of KRW 1,729,500,000 from December 31, 2012, from that time until December 31, 2012, including the issuance of false sales and purchase tax invoices, as if the Defendant received 794,00,000 of the supply price as the supply price was supplied with LED equipment and materials, although the Defendant did not receive goods or services from F, regardless of the fact that the Defendant received goods or services from F.

2. Defendant B.