A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

(2) the date of this judgment.

1. Defendant A is a person driving a low-priced car.

On September 3, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car at around 02:55, and continued to drive the said car at approximately 84 km in the speed of 2400 km-ro, 2408, the south River of Gangseo-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, along with the two-lane roads in front of the point of the Nam River of Gangseo-gu, 2408.

At the same time, there is a situation where it is difficult to secure the driver's view because the 50km of the road at the time of restriction and the surface is milch, so the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to properly secure the view and safely drive by complying with the speed limit.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not find the victim F (58 tax) who is in progress on the road due to negligence, which belongs to approximately 34 km than the speed limit, and did not find the victim F (58 tax) and tried the victim with the front and rear wheels of the above vehicle.

The Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, suffered diversative damage, etc. to the victim in need of treatment of the number of days in fact and returned to the site. As stated in the following 2., Defendant B left the site without taking any specific measure, and went away from the site without going through any specific measures.

2. Defendant B is a person who drives a sports cargo vehicle in Gco.

On September 3, 2016, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 02:56, and continued two lanes of the two-lanes in front of the point of Gangseo-gu, 2408, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, at the 2408-lane, from LG electronic transmission point room to the boundary of the Dong area, at a speed of about 73 km.

At the same time, there is a situation where it is difficult to secure the driver's view because the 50km of the road at the time of restriction and the surface is milch, so the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to properly secure the view and safely drive by complying with the speed limit.

Nevertheless, the defendant.