2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. On July 6, 2007, the Plaintiffs and Defendant C entered into a contract with Defendant D, a licensed real estate agent, to purchase KRW 1.1 billion (hereinafter “instant sales contract”). (However, the purchase price was set at below KRW 850 million, and the trade name and business rights (including all of the house units) are included in the subject matter of sale under a special agreement, which includes F trade name and business rights (hereinafter referred to as “uniting rights”) from Defendant C with respect to each real estate of this case after full payment of the purchase price to Defendant C, and 198m2 (hereinafter “instant building”). < Amended by Act No. 8635, Aug. 30, 2007>

B. Defendant D presented a confirmation and explanatory note of the object of brokerage to the Plaintiffs at the time of the instant sales contract as a licensed real estate agent.

C. At the time of the conclusion of the instant sales contract, Nonparty C, the mother of Defendant C, operated a restaurant with the name of “F” in the instant building until the time of the conclusion of the instant sales contract, and there was a defect in Defendant C’s request to provide a funeral service to the Plaintiffs only from the instant building to the summer file. The Plaintiffs consented to the request, and the Plaintiffs subsequently received each of the instant real estate only from Defendant C on September 10, 2007.

Plaintiff

On September 10, 2007, A filed a complaint against Defendant C against the Defendant C on the theft of 25 electric smelling expenses, 10 navigational cards, and 1 water purifiers owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “instant housework”). As to this, there was a non-prosecution disposition of October 10, 2012 on the ground that the statute of limitations has expired.

E. On May 201, the Plaintiffs were to have extended the instant building without permission from the head of Sinsan-dong from the head of Sinsan-si.