Judgment

In light of the fact that the evidence attached to this part of the facts charged is difficult to believe it for the following reasons, and that the case is likely to occur because the defendant was faced with the victim while the defendant was faced with the victim, it is insufficient to take it as evidence of guilt, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to have committed an indecent act against the victim or committed an indecent act against the defendant.

The recognition is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

In the statement of the preparation of the victim, the police, and this court, each victim stated in the investigative agency that the defendant skids the victim kids on the side of the defendant.

Statement was made, and the sound was expressed in this Court that the sound was “the other”

was stated.

However, in full view of the following circumstances, it is difficult to believe that the above statement of the victimized person was reliable, and it is difficult to eliminate the possibility that the Defendant made a statement by viewing that the Defendant was engaged in the prosecution as stated in the facts charged in the instant case, while playing an play for the Defendant’s s

(1) The injured party had sound which read “the other” in this Court.

On the other hand, it stated to the effect that it is not well memory as to whether the defendant actually left a kisk.

The summary of the statement of the victim in the arrest of the flagrant offender is that the defendant was in favor of the victim.

The victim appears to be written, but the victim does not hold the arms in the police.

The statement is not consistent with the statement (50 pages of investigation records). (2) The CD screen (the victim's act of driving and the defendant's shoulder) attached to the investigation report (the addition of CCTVs in the field of this case) was taken, and the defendant was the victim as stated in the facts charged.