1. On September 8, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime on September 23, 2016: (a) around September 23, 2016, and around September 23:0, 2016, the Defendant was engaged in as if he would pay the drinking value from the E main points of the victim D management in Jinju-si, and ordered the victim to be 100 disease.

In fact, the defendant did not have cash at the time, has maintained a life with no certain occupation and has no particular property, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if he received alcoholic beverages from the victim because there was no particular property.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was provided by the victim with beer with 100,000 won in total at the market price in the same place.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On September 13, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime committed on September 13, 2016, committed as if he were to pay the drinking value at the same place as the preceding paragraph at around 22:00, and ordered the said victim to be 34 illness.

In fact, the defendant did not have cash at the time, has maintained a life with no certain occupation and has no particular property, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if he received alcoholic beverages from the victim because there was no particular property.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 340,000 won in total in the market value from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

3. On September 14, 2016, the Defendant committed a lower crime: (a) around 16:00 on September 14, 2016, committed as if he would pay the drinking value at the same place as that of the preceding paragraph; and (b) ordered the said victim to be 4 soldiers.

In fact, the defendant did not have cash at the time, has maintained a life with no certain occupation and has no particular property, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if he received alcoholic beverages from the victim because there was no particular property.

Nevertheless, the defendant is 40,000 won in total in the market value from the victim.