On August 9, 2016, around 13:20 on August 9, 2016, the Defendant intruded into the instant orchard owned by the victim D and went to a bank according to the amount equivalent to KRW 10,000 in the market value of the six sublime owned by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of D and E;

1. Application of the statutes governing the image of photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 329 of the choice of punishment;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. According to Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence, the reason for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act wants to punish the defendant, and that the defendant has the record of having been sentenced to the suspension of indictment for special larceny in around 2014, the defendant is disadvantageous to the defendant, or the value of damaged articles, and the defendant is a small amount of the damaged articles, and the damaged articles have been returned by being discovered at the site, the defendant is a person who is not a student, and the defendant is a recipient under the National Basic Living Security Act, and the defendant is a first offender and is against the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc., and other various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of the case