협박
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was that the Defendant was in a relationship between the victim B and the victim from June 2013 to February 2, 2018, and the Defendant, on the ground that the victim was not in a state of drinking.
During the period from March 7, 2018 to March 14:2, 2018, to March 05:32, 2018, the Defendant “I am the same as it ends,” and “I am the remaining after the end, I am c and contact from the present. I am the same thickness.”
The thickness to create “the thickness to the extent that I would like to die and die” and “the preparation is made in a large manner,” and the thickness to confirm what false words are made in the “I”.
니에 관한 건 내가 가지고 있으니 얼마든지 해 바 D 이라는 남자하고 관계까지 가진 영상 가지고 있으니 잘 바라 ㅎㅎ“, ” 회사서 보자 너가 가지고 논 만큼 나 또한 너를 가지고 놀아 줄께“ 라는 문자 메시지를 전송하여 피해자를 협박한 것을 비롯하여 그때부터 2018. 5. 2. 경까지 피해자에게 해악을 가하겠다는 내용의 문자 메시지를 전송하여 피해자를 협박하였다.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.
According to the records, the victim may recognize the withdrawal of his/her wish to punish the defendant on August 1, 2018, which was after the institution of the instant prosecution.
Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.