beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.24 2016나75007

보험금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court cited in the judgment of the first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, except for the addition of the following “3. Additional Judgment” as to the assertion emphasized or added by the defendant in this court, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The following shall be added between the parallel 9 and 10 at the bottom of the fifth part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is advanced or added:

In the future, the plaintiff asserts that he needs to conduct anti-scopic surgery on the right dog, and that the operation cost in the future is KRW 2,520,00,00. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit. The plaintiff's "this court" on the 4th page 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "the court of first instance", and the "this sentencing date" on the 5th section at the 5th section is "the date of the judgment of the court of first instance".

3. Additional determination

A. With respect to the plaintiff's degree of contribution to the right check portion, the defendant, with respect to medical expenses and obstacles to the plaintiff's right check portion, was treated on the expressway on February 27, 2010 by the plaintiff, and was treated on the right check portion until June 30, 2010, and immediately after the accident in this case, the plaintiff appealed only for the shot and lusium, and only for the slusium after 40 days have passed since the accident in this case. Since 40 days have passed since the accident in this case, the plaintiff appealed about the right check portion, and the plaintiff's slusium was concealed on the right check part after the accident in this case, and in light of the plaintiff's slusium and slusium before the accident in this case, the plaintiff's slusium and slusium due to the above traffic accident in this case, the plaintiff's slusium and slusium in the right check.