However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2021. 1. 23. 20:52 경 인천 미추홀구 B에 있는 피해자 C이 근무하는 D 지하 1 층 E 식품 매장에서, 그 곳 진열장 위에 있는 피해자 소유인 시가 3,980원 상당의 깻잎 무침 2개, 시가 9,800원 상당의 홍산 마늘 1개, 시가 3,980원 상당의 오이 1개, 시가 5,980원 상당의 진간장 1통, 시가 13,780원 상당의 고추장 1개, 시가 4,680원 상당의 된장 1개 등 총 46,180원 상당의 식료품을 쇼핑백에 담은 채 계산을 하지 않고 가지고 나와 절취하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the C's written investigation report (on-site CCTV verification) and pictures of foodstuffs that a person subject to attached photographs steals;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. In full view of the following conditions for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the sentence shall be determined as ordered by the sentence, taking into account the following conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, health status, motive and attitude of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

In unfavorable circumstances: The circumstances that are favorable to repeat the same kind of crime without being aware of the fact that a fine has been imposed on several occasions due to the theft: The size of the stolen goods is not significant, the stolen goods have been returned, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant.