However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[2013 Highest 1771] The Defendant, who is engaged in driving a Bchip car on March 21, 2013, driven the said car at around 11:00, and turned to the left at about 60km from the shooting distance of the Fchip apartment to the 119 Safety Center at the speed of about 119km.

Since there is a road where on-and-off signal is installed, there is a duty of care to pass along the roadway by properly examining the right and the right of the vehicle driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not discover the victim C (the age of 64) who was fright-hand in a single eye while driving in a single eye without neglecting his duty of care, and was fright-hand on the right-hand side of the running direction, and did not discover the victim C (the age of 64) and had the victim go beyond the reported report by having the victim go beyond the front-hand part of the car of the Defendant.

Therefore, the defendant suffered injury to the victim by the above occupational negligence, such as the opening of the left-hand le executives in need of treatment for about 16 weeks.

[2013 Highest 2160] The Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

On July 9, 2013, the Defendant, at around 11:20, administered D Apartment 104, 1102, 1102, psychotropic drugs, in a single-use injection machine, and injected them by means of inserting approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs into the single-use injection machine, and dilution them into their arms.

Summary of Evidence

[2013 Highest 1771]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer in C (Simplified traffic);

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Sites of traffic accidents and photographs of vehicles;

1. Each general medical certificate (pathography, negosy) (2013 highest 2160);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statement of the prosecution and the prosecutor’s seal;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the written request for appraisal of narcotics;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;