However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Performance of official duties, injury;

A. On January 3, 2015, at around 19:05, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s slope C, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report on traffic accident-related 112 at the Macheon-si, Macheon Fire Station parking lot, and sent it to the scene, that the victim’s slope C, who was employed by the police box, expressed the victim C, “it is necessary to grow up on the left side of the victim’s head” in order to interfere with the victim’s investigation of traffic accidents against the driver of the vehicle involved in the Defendant’s daily accident; (b) took two parts of the victim’s eyes of the victim’s right eye and put about two weeks on the right side of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic accident management, and at the same time injured the victim C.

B. On January 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 19:15 on January 3, 2015; and (b) 19:15, and (c) fessing the Defendant who was arrested as a flagrant offender for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties by assaulting a slope C at the above place, and took the Defendant into custody of the Defendant at the police box; (b) stated that the victim E, who was called up upon receiving a request for support from the scene, would have attached the Defendant and boarded the Defendant on the patrol vehicle; and (c) took the victim’s bridge to walk on several occasions; and (d) took the victim’s bridge back to knee, the Defendant sent the victim a call for approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the escort of police officers, and at the same time injured the victim E.

2. On the ground that the police officer dispatched to the scene at the time, time, and place under paragraph (1) of this Article, arrested a flagrant offender committing a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties as a flagrant offender and let him board the patrol vehicle, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the patrol vehicle, which is a public object, so that the police officer, who was a public object, can take repair costs equivalent to KRW 308,00,000, such as the repair cost even after the back of the patrol vehicle, by prices the lower part of the F patrol vehicle, which was installed at the front window behind the driver’s seat on the shoulder; and (b) by

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;