However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 21:40 on November 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) considered that police officers called up to the front of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, sent the situation favorable to the other party, at the time between the Defendant and taxi drivers, and obstructed the legitimate performance of police officers’ patrol and on-site movement, by threateninging police officers, who are police officers, by threateninging about 20 minutes to threaten the knife and knife the knife with the knife (15cm in the knife length) of dangerous objects at the house, while carrying the knife (15cm in the knife) with the knife, which was on the patrol vehicle, on the knife the knife and knife the knife on the knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 144 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act which choose a penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (including the fact that a police officer has not exercised his/her direct tangible power and the fact that he/she reflects his/her mistake);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;